ACI · Decision Track · DT-002 · Domain D-4 · Open Log
CHP Phase-out and Replacement Dispatchable Capacity · Finland
Tracking the structural gap left by combined heat and power decommissioning
Version 1.0 · 16 April 2026  ·  Active  · Basis: WP-015 §3, §6 · WP-001
Tracking window: 2020–present · Updated on significant developments

Combined heat and power (CHP) has been Finland's only thermally-correlated supply buffer — its output peaks precisely when heating demand and electricity consumption are highest during cold winter periods. WP-015 §3 and §6 identify the structural risk: CHP capacity is being phased out under EU ETS and Fit-for-55 frameworks without equivalent replacement dispatchable capacity. This risk compounds with Shift I (data centre rigid load) and Shift III (market residualisation) to reduce systemic degrees of freedom.

Central finding: CHP capacity is exiting (160 MWe Salmisaari 2025, 279 MWe Suomenoja 2024, coal ban 2029). Replacement investments are thermal-only — electric boilers and heat pumps that add electricity demand, not dispatchable generation. No policy instrument exists to ensure replacement firm capacity. The gap is widening.

1 · Timeline

DateEventSource
2018Government decides coal ban from 2029; €90M incentive package for early phase-out.Finnish Government
2020–2022CHP share of Finnish production ~36% (2022). WEM backtest baseline.ACI / Fingrid
2024-03Fortum warns: CHP exiting market; Finland risks losing billion-euro investments.Fortum
2024Electric boiler heat production reaches 1540 GWh.KAMK / Energiateollisuus
2024-Q2Suomenoja CHP (279 MWe) decommissioned.Helen
2025-04-01Salmisaari coal CHP (160 MWe / 300 MWth) closed — last active coal power plant in Finland. Replaced by 2×100 MW electric boilers and 153 MW wood pellet plant.Helen / Reuters
2025-Q3Aurora Line (700 MW) commissioned, improves import from SE1.Fingrid
2025District heating emissions fall 38%; electric boiler share doubles to 8%.Energiateollisuus
2026-01Energiateollisuus reports CHP electricity capacity at 2500 MW (~1/6 of peak demand day).Energiateollisuus
2026-02"CHP has lost competitiveness"; district heating electrification accelerates.Energiauutiset
2026-04Fingrid winter report notes Aurora Line improved adequacy; no mention of CHP gap.Fingrid

2 · CHP Capacity Trajectory

PeriodCHP share of productionCHP capacity (MWe)Note
2022-0136.4%~3000Pre-OL3, pre-energy crisis baseline
2022-0817.4%Crisis peak, low CHP due to fuel prices
2023-0134.0%Post-crisis recovery
2024-0125.8%OL3 online; Suomenoja retired
2024-1225.5%Salmisaari still operational
2025-04~2500Salmisaari closed; Energiateollisuus figure
2026-04 (WEM)36.7% W24 / 37.1% W168High due to cold April, not capacity recovery

CHP share fell from ~36% (2022) to ~25% (2024–2025). The high share in April 2026 reflects seasonal cold weather, not increased capacity — the underlying trend is downward.

3 · Replacement Dispatchable Capacity

ProjectTypeCapacityReplaces CHP electricity?
Salmisaari electric boilersElectric boiler2×100 MW thermalNo — adds electricity demand
Salmisaari wood pellet plantThermal only153 MW thermalNo — heat only
Data centre flexibility mechanismDemand response800 MW target by 2030No — reduces demand, not dispatchable supply
Fingrid capacity mechanismMarket-wide capacityUnder studyConditional — only if energy-dimensioned; 2031 proposal

Critical observation: All replacement investments to date are thermal-side solutions. They address the heat gap left by CHP closure, but increase electricity demand during winter peaks. No new dispatchable electricity generation capacity has been announced to replace the lost CHP electricity output.

4 · Gap Analysis

Identified needPolicy / investment timelineGap
Thermally-correlated firm electricity capacity
WP-015 §3
CHP phase-out accelerating. Coal ban 2029. No replacement electricity generation announced. Widening — ~500 MWe retired 2024–2025; 0 MWe new dispatchable capacity
Energy-dimensioned replacement (72h+)
WP-001 §3
Electric boilers add load; batteries are fast but not energy-dimensioned. No energy reserve framework. Design gap — no instrument addresses multi-day energy dimension
Policy instrument to ensure replacement €90M incentive for early coal exit (2018) accelerated phase-out. No equivalent instrument for replacement capacity. Asymmetric policy — exit incentivised; entry not secured
Operational recognition Fingrid winter report notes Aurora Line benefit; no mention of CHP gap or replacement need. Monitoring gap — system operator not publicly tracking CHP vs. replacement balance

5 · WEM Snapshot — 16.4.2026

EPP (W168): 0.250 · Tight  ·  FS(p): 42.6% (hydro_RF 0.568)  ·  ECI semi (W168): 89.7%
CHP share of consumption W24: 36.7%  ·  W168: 37.1%

The high CHP share in April 2026 reflects cold weather, not structural recovery. The underlying capacity trend is downward. The semi-firm layer (ECI semi) remains high due to CHP — but this is seasonal, not structural.

6 · Status

Active. This log will be updated upon: announced retirements of CHP capacity, investment decisions in new dispatchable electricity generation, policy instruments addressing CHP replacement, or Fingrid/TEM assessments explicitly addressing the CHP gap.

When the coal ban takes effect (2029) and no replacement firm capacity is in place, this log will document the resulting structural gap.

ACI Decision Track · DT-002 · Open Log · Version 1.0 · 16 April 2026
Basis: WP-015 · Winter Endurance Monitor v2.6
This document records publicly verifiable decision events. It does not advocate specific policies or predict outcomes.
Aether Continuity Institute · aethercontinuity.org